⇄ Korean LLM comparison
Trillion 7B vs A.X 4.0
Independent attribute comparison. A paid diagnostic measures these on your own 20 prompts.
✦Independent · zero vendor funding·Data verified 2026-07-13·Methodology & sources ↗
| Trillion 7B | A.X 4.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Trillion Labs | SK Telecom |
| Params | 7.76B | 72B / 7B Light |
| Context | 32K | 128K |
| License | Open weights (Tri-7B custom license: commercial license if MAU>1M or ARR>$10M; preview Apache 2.0) | Open weights · commercial (Qwen License, MAU < 100M; 7B Light is Apache 2.0) |
| Pricing | Lightweight open model, self-host; cost-minimizing. | Open weights, self-host / on-prem. Based on Qwen2.5 with added Korean training. |
| Korean strength | KOBEST 0.795 (top tier); strong Korean nuance for its size. | KMMLU 78.3 (> GPT-4o 72.5); ~33% better Korean token efficiency than GPT-4o. |
| Best for | Lightweight Korean chatbot, Summarization/analysis, Edge / low-cost | On-prem enterprise, Cost-sensitive Korean work, Data-sovereignty needs |
✦ How to decide
- ›License & hosting: Trillion 7B = Open weights (Tri-7B custom license: commercial license if MAU>1M or ARR>$10M; preview Apache 2.0); A.X 4.0 = Open weights · commercial (Qwen License, MAU < 100M; 7B Light is Apache 2.0).
- ›Cost depends on your Korean token volume and token efficiency, not list price alone.
- ›Korean quality (honorifics, refusals, long-form) varies by use case — measure, don't assume.
Decide on your own prompts in 48h
48h Diagnostic ₩490,000 · tax invoice available
More comparisons